By Jeff Probst
#5781
Heidi wrote:
Jeff Probst wrote:Heidi, without Immunity... would you be going home tonight?


I think there's a good chance that I would have. Somehow, some people see a duo as more threatening than a trio. That math doesn't add up to me, but it doesn't really matter tonight.

Who's the trio?
User avatar
 

Jeff Probst

  • Host
  • Posts: 1433
By Heidi
#5783
Penner wrote:
Heidi wrote:
Jeff Probst wrote:Welcome, guys.

We'll now bring in the jury: Richard, Drew, Dan, Rocky and Val voted out at the last Tribal Council. They cannot be addressed and are only allowed to post smileys

Voting will be due at 9:25:00 sharp.

Heidi is Individual Immunity Tonight. You can choose to keep it or give it away but must do so before 9:06:00 sharp.


I wish I could give it to Val, but she's not here anymore so I'm keeping it for myself.


Translation: Please give me your jury vote Val! I wasn't bitching about you constantly in PM, I swear!


Bitching about Val in PM's is so pre-merge - get with it~
User avatar
 

Heidi

  • Kiribati Tribe
  • Posts: 642
By Ozzy
#5784 I'd consider Sugar a goat. She's been very low key throughout the game. Could be wrong depending on how the jury feels.
User avatar
 

Ozzy

  • Juror
  • Posts: 489
By Heidi
#5785
Jeff Probst wrote:
Heidi wrote:
Jeff Probst wrote:Heidi, without Immunity... would you be going home tonight?


I think there's a good chance that I would have. Somehow, some people see a duo as more threatening than a trio. That math doesn't add up to me, but it doesn't really matter tonight.

Who's the trio?


Hayden, Sierra, and Sugar is one trio. Nate, Ozzy, and Penner is another.
User avatar
 

Heidi

  • Kiribati Tribe
  • Posts: 642
By Sugar
#5786
Ozzy wrote:I'd consider Sugar a goat. She's been very low key throughout the game. Could be wrong depending on how the jury feels.


Yeah! well you smell
User avatar
 

Sugar

  • Juror
  • Posts: 529
By Kelly Wigles
#5787
Heidi wrote:
Jeff Probst wrote:
Heidi wrote:
Jeff Probst wrote:Heidi, without Immunity... would you be going home tonight?


I think there's a good chance that I would have. Somehow, some people see a duo as more threatening than a trio. That math doesn't add up to me, but it doesn't really matter tonight.

Who's the trio?


Hayden, Sierra, and Sugar is one trio. Nate, Ozzy, and Penner is another.



You and Tammy must be in a pretty sweet spot right now then.
User avatar
 

Kelly Wigles

  • Host
  • Posts: 910
  • Location: San Francisco
By Tammy
#5788
Kelly Wigles wrote:Tammy, you and Heidi are the only two partners remaining, not only that, you're both immune tonight, what's your secret?


Sticking to our word *I glare at the boys*
User avatar
 

Tammy

  • Kiribati Tribe
  • Posts: 357
By Kelly Wigles
#5789
Sugar wrote:
Ozzy wrote:I'd consider Sugar a goat. She's been very low key throughout the game. Could be wrong depending on how the jury feels.


Yeah! well you smell



Sugar, do you think this is an accurate depiction of you?
User avatar
 

Kelly Wigles

  • Host
  • Posts: 910
  • Location: San Francisco
By Penner
#5790
Kelly Wigles wrote:Penner, do you agree with what Sierra said that the old alliances are not as clear cut anymore?


Certainly yeah. After the last tribal, Heidi/Tammy seem to have decided to stop talking to half the tribe and have a laser focussed vendetta against me. I'm kinda surprised to be honest because I know if I were at the bottom I'd be trying my best to work my way back into the numbers.

That being said, I'm probably getting enough votes tonight to send me home, so I don't think my opinion on their gameplay carries much weight. I'd prefer it hadn't become so adversarial though.
User avatar
 

Penner

  • Juror
  • Posts: 441
  • Location: Dublin, Ireland
By Sugar
#5792
Kelly Wigles wrote:
Sugar wrote:
Ozzy wrote:I'd consider Sugar a goat. She's been very low key throughout the game. Could be wrong depending on how the jury feels.


Yeah! well you smell



Sugar, do you think this is an accurate depiction of you?


I don't care what the popular opinion is of me, I'm awesome
User avatar
 

Sugar

  • Juror
  • Posts: 529
By Jeff Probst
#5793
Ozzy wrote:I'd consider Sugar a goat. She's been very low key throughout the game. Could be wrong depending on how the jury feels.

Here's the problem with the goat thing... even if they aren't necessarily goats... everyone believes they have a solid path to the finals with the goat(s), but not everyone will. When players subscribe to the "goat" strategy, they often forget, that they themselves will at some point be the most threatening person left in the game.
User avatar
 

Jeff Probst

  • Host
  • Posts: 1433
By Nate
#5794
Jeff Probst wrote:
Ozzy wrote:
Jeff Probst wrote:Ozzy, are there any final 3 goats currently in the game?


I think so but it's really hard pinpointing what the jury will do. Someone who I consider a goat might gain votes for being more low key. So yea I think there might be some but it's hard to be sure.

If what Ozzy says is true... Nate, are people fighting over those goats to be in the finals with them? Are you one of them?


I don't know. I think everyone who watched Faroe knows that "the people fighting over goats" strategy has screwed both me and pretty much everybody who made it past say, Final 10 of that season.

I don't know if I am a goat to be honest. There are definitely people in the jury who don't like me and I don't think I've had the best social game this time round, but it's still the final 8.
User avatar
 

Nate

  • Juror
  • Posts: 581
  • Location: London
By Ozzy
#5795
Kelly Wigles wrote:So Nate, Ozzy and Penner, Tammy just basically accused you guys of being traitors, care to explain yourselves?


Yea we went back on our word with them to vote out Val (sorry girl). And that would make us traitors.
User avatar
 

Ozzy

  • Juror
  • Posts: 489
By Penner
#5796
Kelly Wigles wrote:So Nate, Ozzy and Penner, Tammy just basically accused you guys of being traitors, care to explain yourselves?


The pair twist made it insanity for the 3 of us to go to final 5 with them. Especially considering I tried to work out a deal with them to go to final 3 together and they weren't interested. I'm not just gonna sit around and do nothing.
User avatar
 

Penner

  • Juror
  • Posts: 441
  • Location: Dublin, Ireland
By Heidi
#5797
Penner wrote:
Kelly Wigles wrote:Penner, do you agree with what Sierra said that the old alliances are not as clear cut anymore?


Certainly yeah. After the last tribal, Heidi/Tammy seem to have decided to stop talking to half the tribe and have a laser focussed vendetta against me. I'm kinda surprised to be honest because I know if I were at the bottom I'd be trying my best to work my way back into the numbers.

That being said, I'm probably getting enough votes tonight to send me home, so I don't think my opinion on their gameplay carries much weight. I'd prefer it hadn't become so adversarial though.


We didn't decide to stop talking to you. We tried talking to you in our alliance group message, even after you tore that alliance apart by voting out Val, and you gave us a bunch of bullshit reasons that made no sense to justify your move last round. Then you avoided us all weekend, despite it seeming wise to come to Tammy and I in order to combat the other trio in the game.

Your opinion on things doesn't matter because you might be leaving tonight - your opinion on things doesn't matter because it's wrong and based on a number of fallacies.
User avatar
 

Heidi

  • Kiribati Tribe
  • Posts: 642
By Kelly Wigles
#5798
Penner wrote:
Kelly Wigles wrote:Penner, do you agree with what Sierra said that the old alliances are not as clear cut anymore?


Certainly yeah. After the last tribal, Heidi/Tammy seem to have decided to stop talking to half the tribe and have a laser focussed vendetta against me. I'm kinda surprised to be honest because I know if I were at the bottom I'd be trying my best to work my way back into the numbers.

That being said, I'm probably getting enough votes tonight to send me home, so I don't think my opinion on their gameplay carries much weight. I'd prefer it hadn't become so adversarial though.


Well, considering they're immune tonight and if it's true that there are 2 alliances of trio's vying for their support and Heidi/Tammy stopped talking to you, I guess this means you guys are in the bottom?
User avatar
 

Kelly Wigles

  • Host
  • Posts: 910
  • Location: San Francisco
By Penner
#5799
Jeff Probst wrote:
Ozzy wrote:I'd consider Sugar a goat. She's been very low key throughout the game. Could be wrong depending on how the jury feels.

Here's the problem with the goat thing... even if they aren't necessarily goats... everyone believes they have a solid path to the finals with the goat(s), but not everyone will. When players subscribe to the "goat" strategy, they often forget, that they themselves will at some point be the most threatening person left in the game.


Make big moves! No, vote out the goats! No, make big moves!

Jeff pls
User avatar
 

Penner

  • Juror
  • Posts: 441
  • Location: Dublin, Ireland